tag:quandyfactory.com,2014-7-28:/2014728 2014-7-28T12:00:00Z Quandy Factory Newsfeed - All Quandy Factory is the personal website of Ryan McGreal in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.. http://quandyfactory.com/blog/135/a_year_of_running 2014-07-28T12:00:00Z A Year of Running <h3>Introduction</h3> <p>A year ago, I was an obese 39-year-old on the threshold of middle age. I could no longer freeload on good genes or youth to keep me free of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, asthma and the other chronic diseases that accompany excess weight and poor fitness. </p> <p>My lower back hurt, my knees hurt, and I would get winded climbing a few flights of stairs (and my right knee would click on every step).</p> <p>I was reasonably active - several kilometres of daily walking, plus regular bike rides - but years of enjoying food a little too much and gaining a few pounds a year had accumulated into a significant problem. I needed something more intense than my daily walking and biking commutes.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bph8OKwCEAEhxJi.jpg" alt="West Hamilton Rail Trail" title="West Hamilton Rail Trail"><br> West Hamilton Rail Trail</p> <h3>Born To Run</h3> <p>I had read the book <em>Born To Run</em> by <a href="http://www.chrismcdougall.com/">Christopher McDougall</a> and was inspired to take up the practice again, more than two decades after I had run as a teenager. </p> <p>I was intrigued by his hypotheses about endurance running and curious about his theories on running shoes and midfoot strikes, which were in sharp contrast with the long-stride-and-heel-strike I had used as a teenager. </p> <p>The running injuries McDougall wrote about - the reason he started exploring his thesis in the first place - reminded me of the reason I stopped running: heels, knees and hips so painful I gave up before I turned 18.</p> <p>Perhaps more importantly, I was inspired by the joy, elation and peacefulness that ran through the book. The idea of running as a blissful activity rather than a painful grind resonated strongly with me.</p> <p>But it's hard to create new habits. It's hard to find time for an additional activity in an already overstuffed daily schedule. I knew that if I was going to succeed at this, I couldn't just hope for the best - I needed to make time for running, to build it into the structure of my day.</p> <p>An opening appeared when my younger son started middle school. He no longer needed me to meet him after school and walk home with him, so I could start taking an hour for lunch instead of a half-hour. That hour became my running time.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bqf8ghOCQAA_2Td.jpg" alt="Running on the Escarpment Trail, Hamilton" title="Running on the Escarpment Trail, Hamilton"><br> Running on the Escarpment Trail, Hamilton</p> <h3>Getting Help</h3> <p>I also needed someone to help me get started on the right foot, so to speak. I had tried to start running a few times over the previous couple of years, and quickly gave up every time because I didn't know what I was doing. </p> <p>It's astonishing to think that anyone needs someone to train them how to run - after all, we start running as toddlers. But years upon years of bad habits, poor fitness, inelegant form and straight-up insecurity get in the way.</p> <p>My wife signed me up for a six-week learn to run workshop with trainer Dave Harrison of Coach House Fitness, an exemplary coach and straight-up awesome guy whose philosophy of running matched what McDougall espouses in <em>Born To Run</em>.</p> <p>Of all the things I learned during that course (I <a href="/blog/133/some_unexpected_benefits_of_running">wrote a little bit about it</a> last November), the one thing that keeps returning to me was Dave's admonition to <em>relax your face</em> when running. A scrunched-up face leads to a tense neck, tense shoulders, stiff arms, balled fists and all-around misery.</p> <p>A relaxed face, on the other hand, brings relaxation all the way down: loose shoulders, relaxed arms, an easy gait and a joyful experience. I see it on the faces of runners I encounter on the trails: the blissed-out look that proves a hard endurance activity can also be a tranquil meditation.</p> <p>I don't mean the so-called "runner's high" release of beta-endorphins and endocannabinoids, either. I've experienced that particular burst of euphoria late in the occasional hard run, but the entire experience is joyful. But I'm getting ahead of myself.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bsb0r5yCYAAIlzb.jpg" alt="Running on the Spring Creek Trail, Dundas Valley Conservation Area" title="Running on the Spring Creek Trail, Dundas Valley Conservation Area"><br> Running on the Spring Creek Trail, Dundas Valley Conservation Area</p> <h3>Starting Out</h3> <p>I took my first run on July 27, 2013, and it was a humiliating reality-check. I ran 2.7 km - by which I mean I alternated between running (slowly) and walking - in around 21 minutes.</p> <p>All of my early runs were like this, for the simple reason that I couldn't run more than a short distance before I was too winded to continue. Here's a chart (from RunKeeper) of an early run. You can see my speed go up and down like a sine wave.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="/static/images/runkeeper_early_run.png" alt="RunKeeper chart: elevation and speed, July 31, 2013" title="RunKeeper chart: elevation and speed, July 31, 2013"><br> RunKeeper chart: elevation and speed, July 31, 2013</p> <p>I ran two or three times a week, giving my sad middle-aged body at least day or two between runs to recover. I generally followed the <a href="http://www.runnersworld.com/running-tips/10-percent-rule">Ten Percent Rule</a> and slowly built up my distance while at the same time building up the amount of time I spent running relative to walking.</p> <p>I just knew that I had to keep the chain going. The first time I gave myself an excuse not to run, it would get progressively easier and easier to beg off doing it until I would eventually just give up again. </p> <h3>Progress and Setbacks</h3> <p>That determination not to break the chain is a big part of why I didn't fail this time. After each run, all I had to muster was enough drive to start the next one so it never felt overwhelming.</p> <p>I still remember the profound feeling the first time I ran the entire distance. It happened nearly a month after my first run. I kept waiting to get too out of breath to keep running but it didn't happen. I got to the end of the run and celebrated an important milestone.</p> <p>Soon after, I reached 5 km for the first time. Things seemed to zoom along from that point. I passed 8 km in October and felt that 10 km wasn't far off. </p> <p>Then, in late November, a problem that had dogged me intermittently since early September bit down hard: medial tibial stress syndrome, the dreaded <em>shin splints</em>. </p> <p>Shin splints are inflammation of the connective tissues along the shinbone, and they're common among new runners who increase the intensity of their exercise too quickly. They hurt like hell and make running almost impossible. </p> <p>On Dave's advice, I cut my distance back to 5.5 km per run. I started icing my shins after every run and several other times a day, incorporated a number of strengthening exercises (like calf raises on a stair), and tried not to be too disappointed that I had lost so much ground.</p> <p>My shins got much better over the next couple of months. Eventually I stopped icing my shins throughout the day, but I still ice them faithfully after a run as a wonderful-feeling preventive measure.</p> <p>By mid-January I was back up to 8 km a run again, and my pace was slowly but steadily getting better. From an 8-minute kilometre (7.5 km/h) in August, I was up to around 6:45/km (9.5 km/h). Still slow, but a significant personal improvement.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrOaCVGCMAARdIc.jpg" alt="Deer on the trail" title="Deer on the trail"><br> Deer on the trail</p> <h3>Winter</h3> <p>I ran outside right through the winter - and a bloody brutal winter it was, too. I still remember my run on January 13: It was so cold out that I ran almost 7 km and never even broke a sweat.</p> <p>The trails were often impassible with ice, so I switched to running on the streets: out along Cumberland to Gage Park and back along Main; or down Wellington to the Waterfront and back up along James North.</p> <p>A forward-leaning foot-strike really helped with the ice. My centre of gravity was always under my feet and half the time I was almost tip-toeing along treacherous paths. The slippery, uneven terrain really strengthened my stabilizing muscles.</p> <p>That said, my feet got wet and I did a lot of sliding around - and my feet did a lot of sliding around inside my wet shoes. I got some nasty blisters that almost sidelined me at one point. I bandaged my blisters, switched my socks from cotton to doubled-up synthetics, tightened my laces a bit and kept at it.</p> <p>There's something indescribably cool about standing outside in the bitter cold after a run, steam pouring not just out of your mouth but also off your exposed skin. As one friend put it, "I feel like a wizard!"</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdT9UYrIQAEt4lP.jpg" alt="Icy winter streets" title="Icy winter streets"><br> Icy winter streets</p> <h3>Long Runs</h3> <p>Heading into February, Dave recommended that I should make one run a week a "long run" - a slower, more long-distance run to build strength and endurance and, of particular appeal to me, burn more fat.</p> <p>So I started doing a long run on Saturdays. It took a while to find a routine that didn't eat into my family time, but I eventually settled on a run starting between 6:00 and 6:30 AM (I normally get up at 4:45 for work, so this is sleeping in).</p> <p>I noticed that my pace on my shorter weekday runs smoothed out and got faster after I started doing long runs. Because I only have an hour for lunch, the distance I can cover is a function of how fast I run. By around mid-March I was running over 9 km for each weekday run and 12 km on my Saturday run.</p> <p>By April I was running a a pace of around six minutes per km (10 km/h) and my weekday runs were up to around 9.5 km distance.</p> <p>In mid-April I made a big jump in long-run distance from 12 to 15 km. It violates the Ten Percent Rule but I felt ready and the long runs really started to feel great. </p> <p>I also experienced my first <em>bonk</em>: that moment when your glycogen stores run out and you start to feel like crap. That was the last time I went out on an empty stomach. Now I have a big glass of water and some fruit (or leftover salad from Friday night's dinner) before starting.</p> <p>I look forward to my long run all week. It's quiet, cool and peaceful in the morning. There's no rush to get back to the office, so I can take my time and just enjoy the trail. </p> <p>I enjoy the lush greenery and admire the local wildlife. If I feel like it, I stop and eat wild mulberries or blackberries on the way.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrOaT1qCMAAjsMp.jpg" alt="Mulberries for breakfast" title="Mulberries for breakfast"><br> Mulberries for breakfast</p> <h3>Summer Running</h3> <p>Then summer came and I started running in hot weather. Last summer was brutally hot but my distances in August and September were so short - and my pace so slow - that heat and humidity weren't really limiting factors.</p> <p>This summer has been much milder overall, but hot and humid is hot and humid. </p> <p>The first run I did on a humid day this summer left me feeling weak and nauseated. Another runner who was passing me slowed down to see if I was okay and suggested that I start bringing water with me. </p> <p>Even with water (and a sports drink on my long runs) my pace suffered, but I slowly acclimatized to the summer conditions and my pace drifted back down to around 6:00/km (10 km/h).</p> <p>I should note that I haven't specifically focused on improving my pace. I'm not interested in winning any medals, and I don't want to push too hard and seriously injure something. Nevertheless, my pace has tended to improve over time through the simple act of getting progressively fitter and pushing a bit on each run.</p> <p>I always feel a nice sense of accomplishment when I complete a run at an average speed faster than 10 km/h.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BpSrMe-CQAAVzA6.jpg" alt="Dappled shade on the Escarpment Trail" title="Dappled shade on the Escarpment Trail"><br> Dappled shade on the Escarpment Trail</p> <h3>Today and Tomorrow</h3> <p>So here we are, a year after I took that first humbling half-shamble. In the past year, I have:</p> <ul> <li>Run a total distance of 1,325 km;</li> <li>Burned 155,468 calories;</li> <li>Dropped 50 lbs and four pant sizes;</li> <li>Increased my long run distance to 22+ km;</li> <li>Increased my weekly total distance to around 41 km; and</li> <li>Improved my average pace from 8:15/km to around 6:00/km.</li> </ul> <p>Here is a snapshot chart of every run I've gone on in the past year, tracking my distance and pace:</p> <p class="image"> <img src="/static/images/running_one_year.png" alt="Distance and Pace, July 27, 2013 to July 27, 2014" title="Distance and Pace, July 27, 2013 to July 27, 2014"><br> Distance and Pace, July 27, 2013 to July 27, 2014</p> <p>The <a href="/running">live chart</a> is updated regularly.</p> <p>You can see the overall upward trend in distance and downward trend in pace over the long haul. </p> <p>You can also note the drop in distance in late November when I got shin splints, the introduction of long runs in mid-February (where the distance line starts to zig-zag), and the increasing volatility in my pace once the weather got hot. </p> <p>I find it has really helped to see the larger context of my running history, especially after a particularly slow effort. It has been a bit of a juggling act to alternate between focusing on the immediate next step while still keeping an eye on the bigger picture.</p> <p>A year on, I enormously enjoy the many benefits of running - both the ones I expected and the ones <a href="/blog/133/some_unexpected_benefits_of_running">I didn't expect</a>. I can no longer quite remember how I was able to function day-to-day before I started running. </p> <p>My deepest regret is that I didn't start sooner - I missed out on years of this!</p> <p>If you are considering taking up running, I would suggest the following:</p> <ul> <li><p><strong>Get a trainer:</strong> Find someone whose running philosophy feels comfortable to you and give yourself a good start. I highly recommend Dave Harrison of Coach House Fitness if you're in the vicinity of southwest Hamilton.</p></li> <li><p><strong>Take it slow:</strong> Your body is amazingly adaptive but it responds best to gradual change. If you try to rush things, your connective tissues will object furiously.</p></li> <li><p><strong>It's not supposed to hurt:</strong> sore, achy muscles are a normal part of exercising, but you should not be in actual pain during or after your run. Treat pain with rest and ice, and listen to your body.</p></li> <li><p><strong>Allow yourself to be inept:</strong> Don't be embarrassed to suck at running when you start out. More experienced runners will blow past you on the trail, but remember that they started out the exact same way you did and they got where they are by not giving up. </p></li> <li><p><strong>Small changes add up:</strong> When I started out a year ago, I would have thought you were nuts if you said I'd be running over 40 km a week a year later. </p></li> <li><p><strong>Do your warmups and cooldowns:</strong> I start every run with an <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eit3pGym2Dg">ABC drill</a> and end every run with a cooling walk, calf raises and stretches, followed by ice on my shins. </p></li> <li><p><strong>Remember to enjoy yourself:</strong> Running is supposed to feel <em>good</em>. Think about it as a reward, not a punishment. Allow yourself to feel embodied and connected through running. You are tapping into a profoundly human legacy that goes back millions of years, so don't be surprised to experience a sense of wonder and even reverence.</p></li> </ul> <p>So far, I haven't run with specific goals in mind - other than the obvious one, which is to keep at it. That said, I've got my eye on next year's <a href="http://www.aroundthebayroadrace.com/">Around The Bay Road Race</a>, a 30 km run <a href="https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=114954809910133418529.00045a7921454be2ed2ca&ll=43.280955,-79.821167&spn=0.167959,0.215263&z=12&dg=feature">around Hamilton Harbour</a>. </p> <p>Around The Bay is the oldest road race in North America and a proud Hamilton tradition, and it would be a huge honour for me to participate.</p> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/blog/133/some_unexpected_benefits_of_running 2013-11-27T12:00:00Z Some Unexpected Benefits of Running <p>Four months ago, increasingly conscious of the steadily thickening layer of fat around my middle and roused into action by the imminent arrival of my 40th birthday, I started running. I wanted to lose some weight, get into better shape, and improve my cardiovascular fitness, and running seemed like a great way to do it.</p> <p class="image"> <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BWtx3PUCAAALf1W.jpg" alt="Escarpment Trail, Hamilton" title="Escarpment Trail, Hamilton"><br> Escarpment Trail, Hamilton </p> <h3>Born to Run</h3> <p>I was inspired by Christopher McDougall's fantastic book <em>Born to Run</em>, which made a lot of sense in its hypothesis of humans as highly optimized persistence hunters who literally ran for survival. </p> <p>Even more important was McDougall's transformative experience switching from a heel-striking gait to a forefoot/midfoot strike, which he credits with all but eliminating the injuries and chronic pains that had plagued him for years.</p> <p>This resonated with me because I ran a lot as a child and again as a teenager, but stopped in both cases because of persistent pain in my heels and knees. Like most people who grew up during the 1970s running revival, I ran with a long stride and a heel-strike - a gait that is made possible through the thick padding and cushioning of modern running shoes.</p> <p>McDougall's thesis is that this gait is unnatural, and that shoes designed to protect our feet, legs and hips from the pounding of running actually allow more damage to occur. He says we should be running the way we run when barefoot - on the balls and toes of our feet, not on the heels.</p> <h3>Learning to Run</h3> <p>After thinking for a long time that I should really do something with this information, I finally signed up for a six-week Learn to Run course with an excellent running coach - the talented, knowledgeable and all-around awesome Dave Harrison, whose philosophy of running was very similar to what McDougall espoused in his book.</p> <p>Over six Wednesday evenings, I learned: proper running form; the Ten Percent Rule; warming up; stretching; exercising my core; strengthening my ankles, knees and hips; running up and down hills; running on trails; how to dress to avoid chafing; and how to sooth sore shins. </p> <p>I learned that you shouldn't grimace when you're running, because scrunching up your face causes the rest of your body to scrunch up too. I learned that "No Pain, No Gain" is nonsense - running is supposed to feel good, not painful.</p> <h3>Benefits</h3> <p>So far, it's working: I'm slowly losing weight, getting into better shape and improving my cardiovascular fitness. What has surprised me, however, has been the collection of unexpected additional benefits I've noticed from running.</p> <h4>Improved Mood</h4> <p>Of course I've heard that exercise is good for reducing stress, but I experienced it firsthand over the past four months. No matter how anxious or stressed I'm feeling, going for a run calms me right down and allows me to enjoy some perspective on whatever situation is causing me anxiety. Generally, my mood has been better - I'm happier, less prone to losing my cool and more resilient to shocks and aggravations.</p> <h4>Meditation</h4> <p>Somewhat related, I've been pleased with the sheer serenity I get from running. I spend most of my time all up in my head, and running is a wonderful way to get out of my head and into my body. It's a form of meditation: instead of thinking about all the crap weighing on me, I think about breathing out, breathing in, foot stepping down, foot going up, and the myriad connected rhythms of forward motion. I don't always manage to slip into a groove where everything seems to be working in synchronization, but when I do it's a truly amazing experience.</p> <h4>Better Balance</h4> <p>Since I've been running, I find my general balance has improved significantly. I've never been particularly graceful, so this is a pleasant feeling. I expect it is due to a combination of strengthening my ankles, legs and hips for better stability, becoming more conscious of my centre of gravity, and even losing weight. (And likewise with flexibility - I'm getting more bendy.)</p> <h4>Back Pain</h4> <p>I've had intermittent lower and middle back pain since I hurt my back lifting an old, heavy appliance up a flight of stairs when I was 18. It would come and go based on how well I was maintaining my posture, whether I slouched in a chair for long periods, whether I slept on my stomach and how long I spent in bed (over eight hours and I'd pay the price). Since I've been running, my back has been entirely pain-free. This is likely due to a combination of weight loss, core strengthening and improved attention to blalance and posture.</p> <h4>Less Eating</h4> <p>This was perhaps the most surprising. A major impetus for starting to run was my realization that attempts to lose weight by eating less were highly unlikely to be successful, and I had better focus on the accounts payable side of my body's metabolic ledger. I assumed that when I started running I would eat <em>more</em>, because I would be more hungry. In fact the opposite has happened: I have less appetite in general, and after going for a run I'm specifically motivated not to snack, since I know how much work I have to do to burn off those extra calories.</p> <h4>Improved Productivity</h4> <p>I'm not as surprised about this, but I find a lunchtime run really unlocks my ability to solve problems and get things done in the afternoon. For years, my go-to method for solving a particularly nettling coding problem has been to put it out of my head and go for a brisk walk, and that's even more true of an hour-long run.</p> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/site/24/home 2013-08-22T12:00:00Z Home <p style="float: right; margin-left: 5px;"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://raisethehammer.org/static/images/ryan_mcgreal_sm.jpg" alt="Ryan McGreal" title="Ryan McGreal"></p> <p>This is the personal website of Ryan McGreal in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. </p> <p>I live with my family and work as a programmer and writer. I am the editor of <a href="http://raisethehammer.org">Raise the Hammer</a> and volunteer with <a href="http://hamiltonlightrail.ca/" target="_blank">Hamilton Light Rail</a>, a citizen group dedicated to bringing light rail transit to Hamilton. </p> <p>Several of my <a href="/essays/">essays</a> have been published in the <cite>Hamilton Spectator</cite>.</p> <p>This website serves mainly as a handy repository of <a href="/essays/">published essays</a>, <a href="/projects/">active projects</a>, <a href="/blog/">random musings</a> and <a href="/links/">links</a> that I work on on or use frequently. It's also an online playground where I can try out new ideas.</p> <p>For a much more detailed introduction to the site and its subject matter, check out the <a href="/about/">About</a> page.</p> <p>Otherwise, feel free to contact me via email: <a href="mailto:ryan@quandyfactory.com">ryan@quandyfactory.com</a>.</p> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/blog/131/stand_your_ground_or_last_man_standing 2013-07-31T12:00:00Z Stand Your Ground or Last Man Standing <p>The death of Trayvon Martin at the hands of George Zimmerman, and the latter's subsequent acquittal on the charge of second degree murder, demonstrates forcefully why <em>Stand Your Ground</em> laws have no place in a civil, law-based society.</p> <p>The <a href="http://videos.mediaite.com/audio/Raw-Audio-911-Call-George-Zimme">audio recording</a> of Zimmerman's 911 call is instructive. You can also <a href="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/326700-full-transcript-zimmerman.html">read a transcript</a>.</p> <p>Zimmerman, a self-styled neighbourhood watch patrol, phoned in to report "a real suspicious guy" who "looks like he's up to no good" because Martin was walking calmly in the rain looking at houses as he passed them. </p> <p>Zimmerman complained, "These assholes, they always get away."</p> <p>You can hear the sound of movement and Zimmerman sounds out of breath. The dispatcher asked, "Are you following him?" </p> <p>Zimmerman replied, "Yeah."</p> <p>The dispatcher said, "Okay, we don't need you to do that."</p> <p>The dispatcher then tried to get Zimmerman to return to his car and wait for the police. Instead, Zimmerman asked for the police to call him when they arrived so he could meet them.</p> <p>Zimmerman continued to pursue Martin despite being directed not to by the dispatcher. That pursuit led to a confrontation, and that confrontation led to Zimmerman shooting Martin point-blank in the chest and killing him. </p> <p>There is some uncertainty over whether Martin attacked Zimmerman during the confrontation, but it is clear that the confrontation took place because Zimmerman took it upon himself to protect his neighbourhood from Martin.</p> <p>Keep this in mind: <em>Martin was doing nothing wrong</em> when Zimmerman confronted him. He was unarmed and walking lawfully toward his own place of residence with a pack of Skittles in his pocket after a trip to the convenience store. </p> <p>If you were walking alone at night and an angry, suspicious stranger pursued you, how would you react?</p> <p>The idea behind Florida's <em>Stand Your Ground</em> law is that a citizen has the right to use force, including deadly force, in the defence of self and property from danger. Specifically, it maintains that an individual does not have any responsibility to try and avoid a confrontation or retreat from danger in any location where the individual is legally allowed to be present.</p> <p>The reason Zimmerman was not convicted is that <em>Stand Your Ground</em> covers his shooting as self-defence, even though Martin was not trespassing on Zimmerman's property and it was Zimmerman who pursued and confronted Martin. Thanks to <em>Stand Your Ground</em>, Zimmerman's jury was instructed that he had no duty to retreat from conflict, so any uncertainty over who attacked first was enough to provide a reasonable doubt and acquit him.</p> <p>Zimmerman's supporters defend Zimmerman's right to DIY vigilanteeism and violence in patrolling his gated community. Strangely, those same people seem silent on the question of whether Martin <em>also</em> had a right to "stand his ground" when a stranger pursued and confronted him after deciding he was a threat.</p> <p>What if the exchange had unfolded differently? What if Martin had killed Zimmerman instead of the other way around? Would Martin be the one acquitted of second degree murder thanks to Florida's <em>Stand Your Ground</em> law, since he had a right to defend himself from this stranger who made him feel threatened?</p> <p>In a situation where there are two people who mutually feel threatened by each other, <em>Stand Your Ground</em> creates a situation in which personal security becomes a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positional_good">positional good</a> that can accrue only to the stronger party in the exchange, at the expense of the weaker party. </p> <p>In other words, <em>Stand Your Ground</em> replaces the rule of law with the primitive concept of <em>might makes right</em> that the rule of law was supposed to replace. It squanders the positive sum game that a level legal playing field provides and returns us to a state in which mutual distrust spirals into needless violence.</p> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/projects/74/solitaire 2013-05-08T12:00:00Z Solitaire <p>This is a version of solitaire I hacked up using HTML, CSS, javascript with <a href="http://jquery.com">jQuery</a>, <a href="http://jqueryui.com/">jQUery-UI</a> draggable, the <a href="https://github.com/DanielRapp/Noisy">Noisy</a> jQuery plugin, and only one small image. It's pretty nasty, but I wanted to get a feel for the draggable jquery-UI functionality. </p> <p><strong>Demo</strong>: <a href="http://quandyfactory.com/static/solitaire/solitaire.html">http://quandyfactory.com/static/solitaire/solitaire.html</a></p> <p><strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/quandyfactory/Solitaire">https://github.com/quandyfactory/Solitaire</a></p> <p><strong>Update</strong>: You can play this game live, courtesy of PythonAnywhere:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://www.pythonanywhere.com/gists/459573/rps.py/ipython2/">https://www.pythonanywhere.com/gists/459573/rps.py/ipython2/</a></li> </ul> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/blog/118/why_bloomberg_is_wrong_about_terrorism_response 2013-04-23T12:00:00Z Why Bloomberg is Wrong About Terrorism Response <p>There's quite a bit to like about New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, especially if you like walking, cycling and living in a lively city. But at the same time, Bloomberg's inclination to technocratic paternalism has a dark side that surfaces from time to time. </p> <p>In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings, <a href="http://politicker.com/2013/04/bloomberg-says-post-boston-interpretation-of-the-constitution-will-have-to-change/">Bloomberg warned</a> that the country's "interpretation of the Constitution" will "have to change".</p> <blockquote> <p>"Look, we live in a very dangerous world. We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms. New Yorkers probably know that as much if not more than anybody else after the terrible tragedy of 9/11," he said.</p> <p>"We have to understand that in the world going forward, we're going to have more cameras and that kind of stuff. That's good in some sense, but it's different from what we are used to," he said.</p> </blockquote> <p>There's a glaring problem with Bloomberg's assessment of both the problem and the solution: the world is no more dangerous today than it was when the US Constitution was written. </p> <p>In fact, by every conceivable measure - including violence of all kinds - it is vastly <em>less</em> dangerous today than just about any time in history.</p> <p>More to the point, most of the danger we do face today does not come from terrorists. Terrorists are not as interested in taking lives as they are in capturing the public attention - more specifically, the public's <em>panicky</em> attention. </p> <p>Humans are notoriously subject to a cognitive bias called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Availability_heuristic">availability heuristic</a>, by which we evaluate how likely or common something is by how easily we can call examples of it to memory.</p> <p>Terrorism plays on this cognitive bias because terrorist attacks are extremely dramatic and high-profile, and thus imprint themselves strongly on our memory. </p> <p>When the news media, politicians and commentators pile on by focusing disproportionately on such events, they can trigger an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Availability_cascade">availability cascade</a> - a self-reinforcing cycle in which more focus on an event motivates people to think more about it, which in turn leads people to focus more on it.</p> <p>Reactions like Bloomberg's, in which he argues that Americans need to reinterpret their Constitution to accept a loss of rights in the face of the threat of terrorism, are precisely the wrong way to approach the matter.</p> <p>There are a few <a href="https://chronicle.com/article/Era-in-Ideas-Terrorism/128490">important facts about terrorism</a> that should put our fear in context:</p> <ul> <li><p>Muslim-American terrorism has been <a href="http://tcths.sanford.duke.edu/documents/Kurzman_Muslim-American_Terrorism_final2013.pdf">in steady decline</a> for the past decade. The risk is getting smaller, not bigger.</p></li> <li><p>More generally, terrorist organizations tend to collapse over time, through various combinations of frustration, attrition and overreach.</p></li> <li><p>Terrorists themselves tend to be inept, amateurish and incompetent.</p></li> <li><p>The preferred methods of terrorism - like homemade IEDs built from pressure cookers - tend to be highly ineffective at killing people.</p></li> </ul> <p>On the same day that three people were killed in the Boston Marathon bombings, approximately 40 Americans country-wide were murdered for various non-terrorist reasons. </p> <p>Also on the same day, approximately 140 Americans died via guns (this includes suicides, which make up two-thirds of the total, and accidental deaths).</p> <p>We can keep going. On an average day in the United States, approximately 85 people are killed in automobile accidents, 16 people are killed in falls, 14 people are killed from accidental poisoning, and ten people are killed in home fires.</p> <p>My point is that the fear that we feel about terrorism is vastly disproportionate to the risk that we will experience it - especially compared to the kinds of things we rarely think about but really should worry about.</p> <p>Bruce Schneier <a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/05/should_terroris_1.html">put it best</a> in a 2005 essay when he wrote:</p> <blockquote> <p>If a risk is in the news, then it's probably not worth worrying about. When something is no longer reported -- automobile deaths, domestic violence -- when it's so common that it's not news, then you should start worrying.</p> </blockquote> <p>By no means do I mean to dismiss or demean or make light of the trauma, injury and death experienced by the people who experienced the Boston Marathon terror attack. </p> <p>However, it will only compound the tragedy if we allow such an event to transform our civilization from one that esteems liberty, autonomy and privacy into one that sacrifices those things for needless and counterproductive expedience.</p> <p>The appropriate way to respond to terrorism is the same as it has always been: through effective, targeted law enforcement measures that build on <a href="http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/04/25/muslims_hold_key_to_fighting_terror.html">good community relationships</a> and do not violate the civil liberties of innocent citizens.</p> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/blog/94/adria_richards_and_the_allocation_of_outrage 2013-03-28T12:00:00Z Adria Richards and the Allocation of Outrage <p>One of the most glaring observations in light of the Adria Richards fiasco has been the allocation of outrage by the tech community:</p> <p class="centered"> <img src="http://i.imgur.com/9Jg2brL.png" alt="Allocation of Outrage" title="Allocation of Outrage" style="max-width: 100%"> </p> <p>The so-called "discussion" about whether Richards did the right thing when she tweeted a photo of two Python Conference attendees telling sexual jokes in violation of the event's Code of Conduct hasn't been much of a debate. </p> <p>Rather, it has been a general piling-on with a generous helping of condescension and chauvinism. There has been only a smattering of disagreement and it has been summarily dismissed with a combination of the most perfunctory hand-waving and sheer shouting-down.</p> <p>Meanwhile, the avalanche of rape threats, death threats, insults, intimidation, mockery and so on get by with, at best, a passing and semi-apologetic mention: <em>Of course death threats are wrong, but...</em></p> <p>Worse, the tech community immediately and decisively latched onto a convenient portrait of Richards as an underhanded, incompetent, cowardly, race-baiting, gender-baiting fraud with a manipulative agenda to aggrandize herself at the expense of everyone around her. This, despite almost none of the participants to this condemnation knowing anything about her. </p> <p>It was a classic <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Availability_cascade">availability cascade</a>, with each iteration of outraged commentary boiling the portrait into a cruder and uglier pastiche. </p> <p>No amount of counter-evidence could make a dent in this depiction - the very same depiction, incidentally, that is immediately <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/courtneystanton/a-woman-walks-into-a-tech-conference">slapped onto every woman</a> who dares to speak up about gender issues in the tech industry:</p> <blockquote> <p>A woman in the tech community identified people violating the stated Code of Conduct of the group. She was summarily run out of the community. Oh, wait, that wasn't just this week, that was <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-women/2007-March/000727.html">six years ago</a>.</p> <p>A woman in the tech community takes her blog offline and stops speaking publicly after receiving death threats for a month. That was also <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070503012914/http://headrush.typepad.com/whathappened.html">six years ago</a>.</p> <p>A man attending a festival for the tech community harassed and attempted sexual assault on multiple women in attendance. That was <a href="http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Sexual_assault_at_Southeast_LinuxFest">three years ago</a>.</p> <p>A man attending a high-profile invite-only tech event groped and harassed multiple women in attendance. That was also <a href="http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Groping_at_FOO_Camp">three years ago</a>.</p> <p>A very high-profile man in the tech community is arrested for multiple counts of sexual assault. The tech community assumes loudly and repeatedly that the women reporting the assaults are lying. Again, this was <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.com/2010/12/15/mooreandme-on-dude-progressives-rape-apologism-and-the-little-guy/">three years ago</a>.</p> <p>A woman representing her employer at a large tech event was physically assaulted by a man attending the event. That was <a href="http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Assault_at_OSCON">two years ago</a>.</p> <p>A sponsored hackathon lists "friendly (female) event staff" delivering beer to participants as a "great perk" of participating. That was <a href="http://thenextweb.com/us/2012/03/20/sqoot-loses-sponsors-following-misogynistic-description-of-their-api-jam-event/">last year</a>.</p> <p>A prominent man in the tech community was hired by a large computer manufacturer to be its master of ceremonies at a customer summit, where he said things like, "Men have invented everything worthwhile. All we can thank women for is the rolling pin." That was also <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20120705070446/http://news.cnet.com/8301-31322_3-57431869-256/why-we-need-to-keep-talking-about-women-in-tech/">last year</a>.</p> <p>A woman who produces online feminist educational content ran a Kickstarter campaign to examine tropes about women in video games. In response, avid gamers sent her rape and death threats, vandalized her Wikipedia page, and created a game that allowed the player to "beat up" the woman's image. Again, this was only <a href="http://www.feministfrequency.com/2012/07/image-based-harassment-and-visual-misogyny/">last year</a>.</p> </blockquote> <p>Everyone circulated and referred to a <a href="http://amandablumwords.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/3/">post by Amanda Blum</a> that started with the statement, "I don't like Adria Richards," called her a "bully" and suggested that her action was part of a pattern of creating drama about gender issues to drive traffic to <a href="http://butyoureagirl.com">her blog</a>. </p> <p>The same people mostly ignored Gayle Laakmann McDowell's <a href="http://www.technologywoman.com/2013/03/24/digging-beneath-the-surface-that-amanda-blum-article-on-adria-richards-is-not-what-it-seems/">detailed review of the instances Blum cited</a> that cast them in a far more reasonable and less sinister light. But that detailed analysis got little play because it didn't fit into the convenient caricature.</p> <p>Also ignored was an <a href="http://www.dogsandshoes.com/2013/03/adria.html">article</a> by Sarah Milstein in which she called Richards a "model speaker, seeking and taking feedback on her presentation, showing flexibility in the logistics around her talks, and on one occasion, giving a high-pressure talk as she was still recovering from a bout of food poisoning".</p> <p>No matter how you try to parse it, it's unambiguously clear that our community whipped itself into an apoplectic firestorm of outrage when a woman complained about behaviour in a conference that violated the conference's code of conduct, but at best shrugged and at worst said she deserved it when that very firestorm of outrage overflowed into a forward panic of the most vile, vitriolic and disgusting abuse, insults, threats and mockery against her.</p> <p>That says something most disturbing about our community, and the collective unwillingness even to <em>acknowledge</em> it, let alone come to terms with it, should be all the evidence we need that this industry's blind spot on gender issues is as pervasive as ever.</p> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/blog/93/misogyny_in_the_tech_industry 2013-03-25T12:00:00Z Misogyny in the Tech Industry <p>The tech industry has spoken loud and clear:</p> <p>If a woman sees, hears or experiences inappropriate and/or sexist behaviour from her colleagues and/or peers, she should keep her mouth shut and not make such a big deal out of it.</p> <p>But if a man is called out for inappropriate and/or sexist behaviour, everyone will rise up in a vast eruption of righteous indignation - against the woman who had the nerve to speak up. </p> <p>She will be insulted, abused and threatened with assault and rape. Her motives will be subjected to the ugliest, most damning judgments. Her history will be dragged over for anything that makes her look hypocritical or hysterical.</p> <p>Her employer will readily sacrifice her to assuage the angry mob that launched a denial of service attack on its servers.</p> <p>And far too many people who may not actually be deliberately misogynist will nevertheless pile on, blaming her for 'getting one of the developers fired' and providing cover for the vicious personal attacks against her.</p> <p>Today I am ashamed to work in this industry.</p> <p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/SendGrid/posts/10151502570463967">https://www.facebook.com/SendGrid/posts/10151502570463967</a></p> <p><a href="http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/">http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/</a></p> <p>Background:</p> <p><a href="http://butyoureagirl.com/14015/forking-and-dongle-jokes-dont-belong-at-tech-conferences/">http://butyoureagirl.com/14015/forking-and-dongle-jokes-dont-belong-at-tech-conferences/</a></p> <p><strong>Update 2013-03-21 9:07 PM:</strong></p> <p>In case you're wondering what I'm talking about, here is just a recent sample of tweets that come up in a realtime search. I didn't have to dig far - at all, really - to find them. These are literally from the past <em>20 minutes</em>.</p> <p>Warning: these are extremely ugly, mean-spirited, dismissive and offensive. Some of them use the most degrading words the English language can hurl at a woman.</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/danithesexbomb/status/314904366555492352">https://twitter.com/danithesexbomb/status/314904366555492352</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtagalamo/status/314904308632150017">https://twitter.com/hashtagalamo/status/314904308632150017</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/theinboxofchris/status/314903792116187138">https://twitter.com/theinboxofchris/status/314903792116187138</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/Hoo7on/status/314903535231840256">https://twitter.com/Hoo7on/status/314903535231840256</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/RandallFlagg66/status/314903275558273024">https://twitter.com/RandallFlagg66/status/314903275558273024</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/AaronFesser/status/314902526099062784">https://twitter.com/AaronFesser/status/314902526099062784</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/That_SpenceGuy/status/314902445312577537">https://twitter.com/That_SpenceGuy/status/314902445312577537</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/Ambious/status/314902632189816832">https://twitter.com/Ambious/status/314902632189816832</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/ConcernedHumanB/status/314902402300006400">https://twitter.com/ConcernedHumanB/status/314902402300006400</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/NGC_6611/status/314901944890187776">https://twitter.com/NGC_6611/status/314901944890187776</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/JoonasPder/status/314901596821651458">https://twitter.com/JoonasPder/status/314901596821651458</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/JUANBANE/status/314901550537506816">https://twitter.com/JUANBANE/status/314901550537506816</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/stellar476/status/314901330927947777">https://twitter.com/stellar476/status/314901330927947777</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/NGC_6611/status/314901073435426818">https://twitter.com/NGC_6611/status/314901073435426818</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Update 2013-03-25 6:34 AM:</strong></p> <p>Some excellent write-ups around the web:</p> <ul> <li>Courtney Stanton, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/courtneystanton/a-woman-walks-into-a-tech-conference">A Woman Walks Into A Tech Conference</a></li> <li>Sarah Milstein, <a href="http://www.dogsandshoes.com/2013/03/adria.html">I Have a Few Things to Say About Adria</a></li> <li>Gayle Laakmann McDowell, <a href="http://www.technologywoman.com/2013/03/24/digging-beneath-the-surface-that-amanda-blum-article-on-adria-richards-is-not-what-it-seems/">Digging Beneath the Surface: That Amanda Blum Article on Adria Richards is Not What It Seems</a></li> <li>Matt LeMay, <a href="http://mattlemay.tumblr.com/post/46004653389/on-pycon">On PyCon</a></li> </ul> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/blog/103/on_crimes_and_punishments:_the_cruel_and_unusual_threat_against_aaron_swartz 2013-01-18T12:00:00Z On Crimes and Punishments: The Cruel and Unusual Threat against Aaron Swartz <p>In the aftermath of <a href="http://raisethehammer.org/blog/2634/rip_aaron_swartz">Aaron Swartz' tragic suicide</a>, I've been finding myself thinking that it's time for American lawmakers and prosecutors to re-read Cesare Beccaria's <em>Of Crimes and Punishments</em>. </p> <p>After its publication in 1764, the framers of the US Constitution were persuaded by its reasoning to amend the Constitution to include a prohibition on "excessive fines" and "cruel and unusual punishments".</p> <p>It's important to note that "cruel and unusual" did not mean that such punishments were uncommon. At the time the book was written, every European civilization still routinely used the most barbaric, sadistic and horrific methods for the most appalling ends: torturing suspected criminals until they confessed their crimes, and inflicting appalling physical and psychological torments on the convicted.</p> <p>It's easy to forget, today, that Europe once made widespread, unremarked use of flogging, stocks, breaking on the wheel, burning at the stake, the heretic's fork, knee splitters, the rack, the thumbscrew, and various other sadistic forms of punishment for a staggering array of crimes, including both victimless offenses like blasphemy and imaginary offenses like witchcraft.</p> <p>When Beccaria decried such practices, he argued not that they were uncommon - after all, it was their very commonness to which he objected - but rather that they were offensive to contemporary Enlightenment ideas about fairness, civility and efficacy in the administration of justice.</p> <p>In the case of Aaron Swartz, the threat of 50 years in federal prison and a million dollars in fines for downloading a bunch of academic papers cannot reasonably be considered to be anything other than "excessive" or "cruel and unusual". </p> <p>Apologists for the US prosecutors who brought the case against him are arguing that he was offered a plea bargain that would likely result in only six months of prison time. </p> <p>Carmen M. Ortiz, the US Attorney for Massachusetts who brought the case against Swartz, issued a <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/01/17/us-attorney-statement-on-the-prosecution-of-aaron-swartz/">public statement</a> yesterday that defended her office's actions on the grounds that the plea bargain offered "sought an appropriate sentence that matched the alleged conduct."</p> <p>Ortiz insisted, "At no time did this office ever seek - or ever tell Mr. Swartz's attorneys that it intended to seek - maximum penalties under the law."</p> <p>However, this spectacularly misses the point: Swartz would only be entitled to a reasonable expectation of leniancy <em>in exchange for pleading guilty.</em> </p> <p>I will set aside the <a href="http://io9.com/5975592/aaron-swartz-died-innocent-++-here-is-the-evidence">contention</a> that even a day of time in a federal prison is disproportionate for what amounts to a TOS violation, and instead focus on the fact that a short prison term would only come with a guilty plea.</p> <p>The prosecutor used the threat of 35-50 years in prison to get Aaron to accept a guilty plea. If he chose to plead not guilty and attempt to defend himself, it would cost well over a million dollars in legal fees, and if he were found guilty anyway, the judge would be strongly predisposed to make an example of him by giving him a very long, punitive sentence.</p> <p>A prosecutor forcing someone to admit guilt by threatening a life-destroying cruel and unusual punishment if they do not admit it - why, that is the very essence of using torture to extract a confession!</p> Ryan McGreal 2 http://quandyfactory.com/blog/101/bill_c-38 2012-06-29T12:00:00Z Bill C-38 <p>On June 19, 2012, I sent the following email to the members of the Canadian Senate:</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear Senators,</p> <p>If ever a piece of legislation cried out for sober second thought, it is Bill C-38: a sprawling omnibus bill that makes so many changes at once, it's almost impossible for Parliament, let alone the electorate, to get their heads around it.</p> <ul> <li><p>It is not sound governance to replace clear, consistent rules with discretionary ministerial regulations that are susceptible to political interference and regulatory capture.</p></li> <li><p>It is not prudent stewardship to cut back the Fisheries Act so that it only pertains to commercial fish stocks. If the collapse of the Atlantic cod industry has taught us anything, it is that a commercial stock cannot survive without the broader ecosystem that supports it.</p></li> <li><p>It is profoundly anti-democratic for a government to attempt to impose a chill on non-profit organizations that challenge its agenda. It is only through vigorous, open debate that the best public policy can prevail.</p></li> <li><p>It sets a dangerous precedent to grant the Immigration Minister the power to overrule national immigration policy and reject applicants to Canada whose applications meet the rules. Will we be governed by the rule of law or by the caprice of de facto letters patent?</p></li> <li><p>Similarly, it is dangerous and capricious to grant the government the power to overrule the rulings of the National Energy Board in order to expedite energy and resource projects. Combined with the narrowing of the mandate of environmental assessments and the exclusion of non-business stakeholders, this all but guarantees that resource extraction projects will be determined on the basis of narrow private interest, not the broader public interest.</p></li> </ul> <p>Even this broad swath of policy implications barely scratches the surface of Bill C-38, which crams so many changes into one package that those changes cannot be properly evaluated. Certainly they do not belong in a bill that is supposed to implement the annual budget!</p> <p>As one member of the House of Commons noted:</p> <blockquote> <p>We can agree with some of the measures but oppose others. How do we express our views and the views of our constituents when the matters are so diverse? Dividing the bill into several components would allow members to represent views of their constituents on each of the different components in the bill.</p> <p>The bill contains many distinct proposals and principles and asking members to provide simple answers to such complex questions is in contradiction to the conventions and practices of the House.</p> </blockquote> <p>That member was Stephen Harper, and his prudent appraisal of a 2005 omnibus bill is as true today.</p> </blockquote> <p>Just today, I received a reply from Senator James S. Cowan, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate:</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear Mr. McGreal:</p> <p>Thank you for your email about Bill C-38, the Harper Government's omnibus Budget Bill.</p> <p>I agree with you - the bill is highly objectionable. I too have concerns both about the substance of the bill, and the abuse of our democratic traditions in the way the bill was rushed through Parliament.</p> <p>The Bill is over 420 pages long and contains over 720 clauses. It amends or repeals some 70 statutes, including as you mentioned, Canada's environmental assessment laws and the laws that protected fish habitat. It dismantles the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, the National Council on Welfare, Rights and Democracy, the Public Appointments Commission, the Inspector-General that acts as a check on CSIS - the list goes on and on. It makes extensive changes to Canada's social safety net, including Employment Insurance and Old Age Security.</p> <p>These - and many other provisions in the bill - go far beyond what should be contained in a single bill, and are flatly bad public policy.</p> <p>The Conservatives have rammed it through Parliament, with as little possibility for scrutiny or input from Canadians as possible. In the House of Commons, the entire bill was sent to a single committee, the Standing Committee on Finance - and it had to deal with the entire package in 10 sitting days. Frankly, the changes to Old Age Security or Employment Insurance alone would have deserved that attention. </p> <p>Here in the Senate, the Liberal opposition was able to get the government to agree to send the subject matter of the bill to six different Senate committees for "pre-study", but even this, while better than the cursory study possible in the House of Commons, was simply inadequate to properly examine this mammoth bill. </p> <p>The Conservatives have repeatedly shut down debate and study of this bill, and this is continuing now that the Bill is before the Senate. </p> <p>My Liberal colleagues and I have tried to place on the record our concerns with both the substance and process. Our debate on the Bill - which was again cut short by the Conservatives - can be found at the following link:</p> <p><a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/Sen/Chamber/411/Debates/095db_2012-06-21-e.htm">http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/Sen/Chamber/411/Debates/095db_2012-06-21-e.htm</a></p> <p>Although the process in the Senate is still on-going as I write, it is clear that the Harper government has no intention of allowing real debate and study. It will continue to force the bill through to final passage, over our strong objections and those of many Canadians like yourself.</p> <p>Once again, thank you for taking the time to write to me on this important issue. </p> </blockquote> <p>If you want to send a letter to the Senate, here is a list of their <a href="mailto:andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca, anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca, atauls@sen.parl.gc.ca, bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca, boisvp@sen.parl.gc.ca, braled@sen.parl.gc.ca, brazep@sen.parl.gc.ca, brownb@sen.parl.gc.ca, buthjo@sen.parl.gc.ca, callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca, campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca, carigc@sen.parl.gc.ca, champa@sen.parl.gc.ca, chapum@sen.parl.gc.ca, poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca, cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca, comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca, cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca, dagenj@sen.parl.gc.ca, dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca, dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca, dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca, tessil@sen.parl.gc.ca, dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca, pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca, doylen@sen.parl.gc.ca, mikeduffy@sen.parl.gc.ca, dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca, eatonn@sen.parl.gc.ca, egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca, fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca, finled@sen.parl.gc.ca, fortis@sen.parl.gc.ca, frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca, fruml@sen.parl.gc.ca, fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca, banc@sen.parl.gc.ca, greens@sen.parl.gc.ca, harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca, hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca, lacomd@sen.parl.gc.ca, hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca, jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca, johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca, joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca, kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca, kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca, langd@sen.parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca, losier@sen.parl.gc.ca, smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca, mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca, maltag@sen.parl.gc.ca, mannif@sen.parl.gc.ca, marshe@sen.parl.gc.ca, martin@sen.parl.gc.ca, massip@sen.parl.gc.ca, mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca, merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, meredd@sen.parl.gc.ca, mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca, mocklp@sen.parl.gc.ca, moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca, munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca, mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca, neufer@sen.parl.gc.ca, nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca, ogilvk@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca, patted@sen.parl.gc.ca, russem@sen.parl.gc.ca, plettd@sen.parl.gc.ca, poirir@sen.parl.gc.ca, poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca, rainen@sen.parl.gc.ca, ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca, rivarm@sen.parl.gc.ca, jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca, robicf@sen.parl.gc.ca, runcib@sen.parl.gc.ca, kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca, seidmj@sen.parl.gc.ca, setha@sen.parl.gc.ca, sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca, smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca">email addresses</a>.</p> <hr /> <p>Update: I also received a reply from Senator Elaine McCoy.</p> <blockquote> <p>Hello, and thank you for your email about the omnibus budget bill. I just wanted to let you know that I voted against C-38, as a matter of principle, last Thursday night. A copy of my speech is attached for information. Sadly, the vote did not succeed in stopping the bill as the Conservatives overwhelmingly supported it. </p> <p>You can see the results of the standing vote (as well as other speeches against the bill) by <a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/Sen/Chamber/411/Debates/095db_2012-06-21-e.htm#59">clicking here</a> and scrolling to the section titled Jobs, Growth and Prosperity Bill.</p> <p>Although you and I have not succeeded in persuading the government to follow a different course of action in this instance, I feel it is important we continue to speak out about issues of importance to Canada. I know I will. I hope you do too. </p> <p>Warm regards, Elaine</p> <p><a href="http://www.albertasenator.ca/">Alberta Senator</a></p> </blockquote> Ryan McGreal 2